The way to become a published writer is to write (and to submit what you write). Seems obvious, yet so many would-be writers produce that one story or novel and then rework it endlessly, or submit a story or three, get rejected once (or a hundred times), and decide to give up.
Ira Glass does a wonderful job of explaining the reasons we creative types set out to create our particular art, and why so many become disappointed and quit: http://writerunderground.com/2011/04/28/ira-glass-on-creativity-or-the-gap-between-our-taste-and-our-work/
I would add for writers specifically that the writers who are published are the ones who continued to write NEW stories, and submit those stories, and move past the rejections, until they were published.
Of course, today we have a wonderful short cut — self-publication!
I have repeatedly been asked for advice from writers who have written one story, or been rejected a few times, wanting to know how to proceed, how to become published. And sometimes as part of my response I make the mistake of mentioning self-publication as a possible future option.
Don’t get me wrong, self-publication is a very valid alternative IF your writing is worth reading, and IF you believe you have what it takes to stand out from the sea of other self-published works.
But too often, the would be writer latches onto that option as the answer, because the rest of my advice — to write and submit and be rejected until you are good enough to actually be published — requires work, and a lot of rejection, and letting many of your stories die an anonymous and unnoticed death.
And often the amateur writer believes their writing to be perfectly wonderful and worthy of being read. Unfortunately, it is hard to be objective about one’s own work. I certainly see how bad my early stories are now, though at the time I thought they were completely awesome. I would have self-published them if I’d had the option. And now I am so glad I did not, that they were rejected and I was driven to try again, to try harder, to do better.
So please, if you want to be a writer, then write, and submit, and keep doing that until you are good enough that somebody other than yourself and your mother thinks it is ready for the world to read. Persevere, and become a good writer, not just a “wroter” (someone who wrote that one thing and just keeps reworking that same one thing), or a self-published amateur, and someday you will have something published that is worthy of being read.




19 comments
Comment by Emily C. Skaftun on March 27, 2012 at 1:35 pm
What’s a “wroter”? (last paragraph). But seriously, perspective is hard. I’m struggling with whether or not to self-publish “Oneirotoxicity.” and mad as hell that I missed the epublishing meeting.
Comment by Randy Henderson on March 27, 2012 at 1:38 pm
A wroter is someone who wrote something, and keeps reworking it, bringing that same piece to workshops year after year, etc. but isn’t moving on and growing and writing new stuff.
Comment by Emily C. Skaftun on March 27, 2012 at 1:40 pm
Oh. I’ve never heard that before. Is it a real term?
Comment by Randy Henderson on March 27, 2012 at 1:41 pm
It is one of my terms that I hope will catch on and I will be heralded as brilliant for inventing.
Comment by Emily C. Skaftun on March 27, 2012 at 1:41 pm
Then as your friend I suggest that you make it clearer. I thought it was a typo.
Comment by Randy Henderson on March 27, 2012 at 1:44 pm
Self-publication is a tough decision. My thought would be to hold onto it. A) You never know when an anthology might come along for which that story would be perfect. B) If you self-publish right now, there is not a lot to make your story stand out from all the other self-published stories marketing-wise (no matter how great it is), but if you wait until you have a few more publication credits, possibly even a novel out there, you will have more ability to drive readers who like your work to the story. Also, I’ve heard that when you self-publish, it is good to have several things that you can self-publish rather than one, since that makes you look better to prospective readers, and if they like one thing they will read the next, etc.
Comment by Randy Henderson on March 27, 2012 at 1:45 pm
On the other hand, it is doing nothing for you right now sitting on your hard drive, so I also see the potential benefit of having it out there making you a few dollars and possibly garnering a few fans.
Comment by Emily C. Skaftun on March 27, 2012 at 2:07 pm
Right? Plus it’s 10K, so there are few markets.
Comment by Randy Henderson on March 27, 2012 at 3:51 pm
testing comments trackback.
Comment by Jess Chandler on March 27, 2012 at 9:18 pm
smorgh handler..teehee
Comment by Jess Chandler on March 27, 2012 at 9:18 pm
smorgh handler..teehee
Comment by Randy Henderson on March 28, 2012 at 8:29 pm
[Comment imported from blog]
Comment by Randy Henderson on March 28, 2012 at 8:29 pm
[Comment imported from blog]
Comment by Randy Henderson on March 28, 2012 at 8:29 pm
[Comment imported from blog]
Comment by Randy Henderson on March 28, 2012 at 8:29 pm
[Comment imported from blog]
Comment by Randy Henderson on March 28, 2012 at 8:29 pm
[Comment imported from blog]
Comment by Randy Henderson on March 28, 2012 at 8:29 pm
[Comment imported from blog]